4.6 Article

In vitro evidence of root colonization suggests ecological versatility in the genus Mycena

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 227, Issue 2, Pages 601-612

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16545

Keywords

biotrophy-saprotrophy continuum; ecological niches; functional diversity; Mycena; root-associations

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission [658849]
  2. University of Oslo
  3. Carlsberg Research Grant Foundation [CF18-0809]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [658849] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The root-associated habit has evolved on numerous occasions in different fungal lineages, suggesting a strong evolutionary pressure for saprotrophic fungi to switch to symbiotic associations with plants. Species within the ubiquitous, saprotrophic genus Mycena are frequently major components in molecular studies of root-associated fungal communities, suggesting that an evaluation of their trophic status is warranted. Here, we report on interactions between a range of Mycena species and the plant Betula pendula. In all, 17 Mycena species were inoculated onto B. pendula seedlings. Physical interactions between hyphae and fine roots were examined using differential staining and fluorescence microscopy. Physiological interactions were investigated using C-14 and P-32 to show potential transfer between symbionts. All Mycena species associated closely with fine roots, showing hyphal penetration into the roots, which in some cases were intracellular. Seven species formed mantle-like structures around root tips, but none formed a Hartig net. Mycena pura and Mycena galopus both enhanced seedling growth, with M. pura showing significant transfer of P-32 to the seedlings. Our results support the view that several Mycena species can associate closely with plant roots and some may potentially occupy a transitional state between saprotrophy and biotrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available