4.6 Article

Linking root structure to functionality: the impact of root system architecture on citrate-enhanced phosphate uptake

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 227, Issue 2, Pages 376-391

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16554

Keywords

abiotic stress; citrate; exudation; modelling; phosphorus; root system architecture

Categories

Funding

  1. ERC Consolidator grant [646809]
  2. BBSRC SARISA [BB/L025620/1]
  3. BBSRC SARIC [BB/P004180/1]
  4. NERC [NE/L00237/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/M020355/1]
  6. BBSRC [BB/P004180/1, BB/L025620/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root citrate exudation is thought to be important for phosphate solubilization. Previous research has concluded that cluster-like roots benefit most from this exudation in terms of increased phosphate uptake, suggesting that root structure plays an important role in citrate-enhanced uptake (additional phosphate uptake due to citrate exudation). Time-resolved computed tomography images of wheat root systems were used as the geometry for 3D citrate-phosphate solubilization models. Citrate-enhanced uptake was correlated with morphological measures of the root systems to determine which had the most benefit. A large variation of citrate-enhanced uptake over 11 root structures was observed. Root surface area dominated absolute phosphate uptake, but did not explain citrate-enhanced uptake. Number of exuding root tips correlated well with citrate-enhanced uptake. Root tips in close proximity could collectively exude high amounts of citrate, resulting in a delayed spike in citrate-enhanced uptake. Root system architecture plays an important role in citrate-enhanced uptake. Singular morphological measurements of the root systems cannot entirely explain variations in citrate-enhanced uptake. Root systems with many tips would benefit greatly from citrate exudation. Quantifying citrate-enhanced uptake experimentally is difficult as variations in root surface area would overwhelm citrate benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available