4.6 Article

Is forest fecundity resistant to drought? Results from an 18-yr rainfall-reduction experiment

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 227, Issue 4, Pages 1073-1080

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16597

Keywords

drought; fruit production; global change; mast seeding; rainfall reduction; reproduction; tree fecundity

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish government project [CGL2016-79835-P]
  2. Catalan government project [SGR2014-274]
  3. European Research Council Synergy grant [ERC-2013-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  4. (Polish) National Science Centre [2018/28/U/NZ8/00003, 2017/24/C/NZ8/00151]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recruitment is a primary determinant of the long-term dynamics of plant populations in changing environments. However, little information is known about the effects of anthropogenic environmental changes on reproductive ecology of trees. We evaluated the impact of experimentally induced 18 yr of drought on reproduction of three contrasting forest trees: Quercus ilex, Phillyrea latifolia and Arbutus unedo. Rainfall reduction did not decrease tree fecundity. Drought, however, affected the allocation of resources in Q. ilex and A. unedo but not the more drought tolerant P. latifolia. Larger crop production by Q. ilex and A. unedo was associated with a stronger decrease in growth in the rainfall-reduction plots compared with the control plots, suggesting that these species were able to maintain their fecundity by shifting their allocation of resources away from growth. Our results indicated resistance to change in tree fecundity in Mediterranean-type forest subjected to an average 15% decrease in the amount of soil moisture, suggesting that these ecosystems may adapt to a progressive increase in arid conditions. However, the species-specific reductions in growth may indirectly affect future fecundity and ultimately shift community composition, even without immediate direct effects of drought on tree fecundity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available