4.7 Article

Eomes identifies thymic precursors of self-specific memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells

Journal

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 567-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-020-0653-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute F30 predoctoral fellowship [F30-CA236061, F30-CA217109]
  2. Univeristy of Chicago Medical Scientist Training Program [T32-GM007281]
  3. [R01-AI110507]
  4. [T32-AI007090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Savage and colleagues show virtual memory CD8 T cells arise in the thymus of replete mice, where their differentiation is a robust TCR-directed process. Clonal analyses show their TCR repertoire is reproducible and distinct from conventional cells and that progeny cells harboring such TCRs infiltrate tumors and express PD-1. Unprimed mice harbor a substantial population of 'memory-phenotype' CD8(+) T cells (CD8-MP cells) that exhibit hallmarks of activation and innate-like functional properties. Due to the lack of faithful markers to distinguish CD8-MP cells from bona fide CD8(+) memory T cells, the developmental origins and antigen specificities of CD8-MP cells remain incompletely defined. Using deep T cell antigen receptor (TCR) sequencing, we found that the TCRs expressed by CD8-MP cells are highly recurrent and distinct from the TCRs expressed by naive-phenotype CD8(+) T cells. CD8-MP clones exhibited reactivity to widely expressed self-ligands. T cell precursors expressing CD8-MP TCRs showed upregulation of the transcription factor Eomes during maturation in the thymus, prior to induction of the full memory phenotype, which is suggestive of a unique program triggered by recognition of self-ligands. Moreover, CD8-MP cells infiltrate oncogene-driven prostate tumors and express high densities of PD-1, which suggests potential roles in antitumor immunity and the response to immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available