4.8 Article

Increasing the efficiency and targeting range of cytidine base editors through fusion of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein domain

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 740-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-020-0518-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0110802, 2019YFA0802800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670470, 81873685]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [18411953500]
  4. Innovation program of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-05-E00054]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. ECNU Public Platform for innovation [011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li and colleagues report base editor variants with improved targeting efficiencies and broader editing windows by fusing the original base editors with the single-stranded DNA-binding domain of Rad51. Cytidine base editors are powerful genetic tools that catalyse cytidine to thymidine conversion at specific genomic loci, and further improvement of the editing range and efficiency is critical for their broader applications. Through insertion of a non-sequence-specific single-stranded DNA-binding domain from Rad51 protein between Cas9 nickase and the deaminases, serial hyper cytidine base editors were generated with substantially increased activity and an expanded editing window towards the protospacer adjacent motif in both cell lines and mouse embryos. Additionally, hyeA3A-BE4max selectively catalysed cytidine conversion in TC motifs with a broader editing range and much higher activity (up to 257-fold) compared with eA3A-BE4max. Moreover, hyeA3A-BE4max specifically generated a C-to-T conversion without inducing bystander mutations in the haemoglobin gamma gene promoter to mimic a naturally occurring genetic variant for amelioration of beta-haemoglobinopathy, suggesting the therapeutic potential of the improved base editors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available