4.8 Article

Evaluating drug targets through human loss-of-function genetic variation

Journal

NATURE
Volume 581, Issue 7809, Pages 459-+

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2267-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [F31 AI122592]
  2. NIDDK [U54 DK105566]
  3. NIGMS [R01 GM104371]
  4. Wellcome Trust [102627, 210561]
  5. Medical Research Council [M009017]
  6. Higher Education Funding Council for England Catalyst
  7. Barts Charity [845/1796]
  8. Health Data Research UK
  9. Rosetrees and Stoneygate Imperial College Research Fellowship
  10. Academy of Finland [312073]
  11. Broad Institute
  12. MRC [MR/M009017/1, MC_UP_1102/20] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally occurring human genetic variants that are predicted to inactivate protein-coding genes provide an in vivo model of human gene inactivation that complements knockout studies in cells and model organisms. Here we report three key findings regarding the assessment of candidate drug targets using human loss-of-function variants. First, even essential genes, in which loss-of-function variants are not tolerated, can be highly successful as targets of inhibitory drugs. Second, in most genes, loss-of-function variants are sufficiently rare that genotype-based ascertainment of homozygous or compound heterozygous 'knockout' humans will await sample sizes that are approximately 1,000 times those presently available, unless recruitment focuses on consanguineous individuals. Third, automated variant annotation and filtering are powerful, but manual curation remains crucial for removing artefacts, and is a prerequisite for recall-by-genotype efforts. Our results provide a roadmap for human knockout studies and should guide the interpretation of loss-of-function variants in drug development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available