4.7 Article

STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408-5354

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 494, Issue 4, Pages 6072-6102

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa828

Keywords

gravitational lensing: strong; cosmological parameters; distance scale; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) [HST-GO-15320]
  2. Dissertation Year Fellowship from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) graduate division
  3. Packard Foundation through a Packard Research fellowship
  4. National Science Foundation [AST1714953, AST-1906976, AST-1715611, TG-AST190038, ACI1548562, PHY-1607611, AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  5. Danish council for independent research under the project 'Fundamentals of Dark Matter Structures' [DFF -6108-00470]
  6. VILLUM FONDEN [16599]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  8. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (COSMICLENS) [787866]
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions grant [664931]
  10. Ministry of Education in Taiwan via Government Scholarship to Study Abroad (GSSA)
  11. Proyecto FONDECYT [1190335]
  12. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  13. NSF [ACI-1445606]
  14. U.S. Department of Energy
  15. U.S. National Science Foundation
  16. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  17. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  18. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  19. NationalCenter for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  20. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  21. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  22. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  23. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  24. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  25. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  26. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  27. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  28. Argonne National Laboratory
  29. University of California at Santa Cruz
  30. University of Cambridge
  31. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas
  32. Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  33. University of Chicago
  34. University College London
  35. DES-Brazil Consortium
  36. University of Edinburgh
  37. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  38. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  39. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  40. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  41. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  42. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  43. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen and the associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  44. University of Michigan
  45. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  46. University of Nottingham
  47. The Ohio State University
  48. University of Pennsylvania
  49. University of Portsmouth
  50. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  51. Stanford University
  52. University of Sussex
  53. Texas AM University
  54. OzDES Membership Consortium
  55. MINECO [AYA201571825, ESP2015-66861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2016-0588, SEV2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  56. ERDF funds from the European Union
  57. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  58. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)
  59. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  60. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ci<^>encia e Tecnologia (INCT) e-Universe (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  61. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  62. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  63. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M003574/1, ST/L000652/1, ST/P000525/1, ST/N001087/1, ST/T000473/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  64. STFC [ST/N002571/1, ST/P000525/1, ST/N001087/1, ST/S000623/1, ST/R000433/1, ST/S000550/1, ST/M003574/1, ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a blind time-delay cosmographic analysis for the lens system DES J0408-5354. This system is extraordinary for the presence of two sets of multiple images at different redshifts, which provide the opportunity to obtain more information at the cost of increased modelling complexity with respect to previously analysed systems. We perform detailed modelling of the mass distribution for this lens system using three band Hubble Space Telescope imaging. We combine themeasured time delays, line-of-sight central velocity dispersion of the deflector, and statistically constrained external convergence with our lens models to estimate two cosmological distances. We measure the 'effective' time-delay distance corresponding to the redshifts of the deflector and the lensed quasar D-Delta t(eff) = 3382(-115)(+146) Mpc and the angular diameter distance to the deflector D-d = 1711(-280)(+376) Mpc, with covariance between the two distances. From these constraints on the cosmological distances, we infer the Hubble constant H-0 = 74.2(-3.0)(+2.7) km s(-1) Mpc(-1) assuming a flat Lambda CDM cosmology and a uniform prior for Omega(m) as Omega(m) similar to U(0.05, 0.5). This measurement gives the most precise constraint on H-0 to date from a single lens. Our measurement is consistent with that obtained from the previous sample of six lenses analysed by the H-0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring (H0LiCOW) collaboration. It is also consistent with measurements of H-0 based on the local distance ladder, reinforcing the tension with the inference from early Universe probes, for example, with 2.2 sigma discrepancy from the cosmic microwave background measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available