4.7 Article

Merger rate density of binary black holes formed in open clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 4, Pages 4268-4278

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1440

Keywords

gravitational waves; methods: numerical; stars: black holes

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17H06360, 19H01933, 19K03907]
  2. University of Tokyo Excellent Young Researcher Program
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K03907, 19H01933] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several binary black holes (BBHs) have been observed using gravitational wave detectors. For the formation mechanism of BBHs, two main mechanisms, isolated binary evolution and dynamical formation in dense star clusters, have been suggested. Future observations are expected to provide more information about BBH distributions, and it will help us to distinguish the two formation mechanisms. For the star cluster channel, globular clusters have mainly been investigated. However, recent simulations have suggested that BBH formation in open clusters is not negligible. We estimate a local merger rate density of BBHs originated from open clusters using the results of our N-body simulations of open clusters with four different metallicities. We find that the merger rate per cluster is the highest for our 0.1 solar metallicity model. Assuming a cosmic star formation history and a metallicity evolution with dispersion, we estimate the local merger rate density of BBHs originated from open clusters to be similar to 70 yr(-1) Gpc(-3). This value is comparable to the merger rate density expected from the first and second observation runs of LIGO and Virgo. In addition, we find that BBH mergers obtained from our simulations can reproduce the distribution of primary mass and mass ratio of merging BBHs estimated from the LIGO and Virgo observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available