4.7 Article

Modelling the large-scale mass density field of the universe as a function of cosmology and baryonic physics

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 4, Pages 4800-4819

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1478

Keywords

cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. ERC [716151]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA2015-66211-C2-2, PGC2018-097585-B-C21]
  3. SpanishMinistry of Science and Innovation [FJCI-2017-33816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present and test a framework that models the 3D distribution of mass in the universe as a function of cosmological and astrophysical parameters. Our approach combines two different techniques: a resealing algorithm that modifies the cosmology of gravity-only N-body simulations, and a taryonification' algorithm that mimics the effects of astrophysical processes induced by baryons, such as star formation and active galactic nuclei (AGN) feedback. We show how this approach can accurately reproduce the effects of baryons on the matter power spectrum of various state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations (EAGLE, Illustris, Illustris-TNG, Horizon-AGN, and OWLS, Cosmo-OWLS and BAHAMAS), to better than 1 per cent from very large down to small, highly non-linear, scales (k similar to 5 h Mpc(-1)), and from z = 0 up to z similar to 2. We highlight that, because of the heavy optimization of our algorithms, we can obtain these predictions for arbitrary baryonic models and cosmology (including massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy models) with an almost negligible CPU cost. With these tools in hand, we explore the degeneracies between cosmological and astrophysical parameters in the non-linear mass power spectrum. Our findings suggest that after marginalizing over baryonic physics, cosmological constraints inferred from weak gravitational lensing should be moderately degraded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available