4.7 Article

The impact of AGN feedback on the 1D power spectra from the Ly α forest using the Horizon-AGN suite of simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 2, Pages 1825-1840

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1242

Keywords

(galaxies:)intergalactic medium; (galaxies:) quasars: absorption lines; (galaxies:) quasars: supermassive black holes

Funding

  1. ANR 3DGasFlows [ANR-17-CE31-0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Lyman-alpha forest is a powerful probe for cosmology, but it is also strongly impacted by galaxy evolution and baryonic processes such as active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback, which can redistribute mass and energy on large scales. We constrain the signatures of AGN feedback on the 1D power spectrum of the Lyman-alpha forest using a series of eight hydrocosmological simulations performed with the adaptive mesh refinement code RAMSES. This series starts from the Horizon-AGN simulation and varies the subgrid parameters for AGN feeding, feedback, and stochasticity. These simulations cover the whole plausible range of feedback and feeding parameters according to the resulting galaxy properties. AGNs globally suppress the Lyman-alpha power at all scales. On large scales, the energy injection and ionization dominate over the supply of gas mass from AGN-driven galactic winds, thus suppressing power. On small scales, faster cooling of denser gas mitigates the suppression. This effect increases with decreasing redshift. We provide lower and upper limits of this signature at nine redshifts between z = 4.25 and 2.0, making it possible to account for it at post-processing stage in future work given that running simulations without AGN feedback can save considerable amounts of computing resources. Ignoring AGN feedback in cosmological inference analyses leads to strong biases with 2 per cent shift on sigma(8) and 1 per cent shift on n(s), which represents twice the standards deviation of the current constraints on ns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available