4.7 Article

Dynamical orbital classification of selected N-rich stars with Gaia Data Release 2 astrometry

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 4, Pages 4113-4123

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1386

Keywords

stars: chemically peculiar; Galaxy: bulge; Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [3180210]
  2. Becas Iberoamerica Investigador 2019, Banco Santander Chile
  3. UNAM/PAPIIT [IN105916]
  4. FAPESP [2017/15893-1]
  5. DGAPA-PAPIIT [IG100319]
  6. Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, La Tecnologia y la innovacion 'FRANCISCO JOSE DE CALDAS', MINCIENCIAS
  7. VIIS
  8. Centre national d' etudes spatiales (CNES) [0101973]
  9. UTINAM Institute of the Universite de Franche-Comte
  10. Region de Franche-Comte
  11. Institut des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  12. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  13. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  14. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  15. Brazilian Participation Group
  16. Carnegie Institution for Science
  17. Carnegie Mellon University
  18. Chilean Participation Group
  19. French Participation Group
  20. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  21. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  22. Johns Hopkins University
  23. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  24. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  25. Leibniz Institut f ur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  26. Max-Planck-Institut f ur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  27. Max-Planck-Institut f ur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  28. Max-Planck-Institut f ur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  29. National Astronomical Observatory of China
  30. New Mexico StateUniversity
  31. NewYork University
  32. University of Dame
  33. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  34. Ohio StateUniversity
  35. Pennsylvania State University
  36. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  37. United Kingdom Participation Group
  38. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  39. University of Arizona
  40. University of Colorado Boulder
  41. University of Oxford
  42. University of Portsmouth
  43. University of Utah
  44. University of Virginia
  45. University of Washington
  46. University of Wisconsin
  47. Vanderbilt University
  48. Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have used the galaxy modelling algorithm GRAVPOT16, to explore the most probable orbital elements of a sample of 64 selected N-rich stars across the Milky Way. We use the newly measured proper motions from Gaia Data Release 2 with existing line-of-sight velocities from the second generation of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE-2) and spectrophotometric distance estimations from STARHORSE. We adopted a set of high-resolution particle simulations evolved in the same steady-state Galactic potential model with a bar, in order to identify the groups of N-rich stars that have a high probability of belonging to the bulge/bar, disc and stellar halo component. We find that the vast majority of the N-rich stars show typically maximum height from the Galactic plane below 3 kpc, and develop eccentric orbits (e > 0.5), which means that these stars appear to have bulge/bar-like and/or halo-like orbits. We also show that similar to 66 per cent of the selected N-rich stars currently reside in the inner Galaxy inside the corotation radius, whilst similar to 14 per cent are in halo-like orbits. Among the N-rich stars in the inner Galaxy, similar to 27 per cent share orbital properties in the boundary between bulge/bar and disc, depending on the bar pattern speeds. Our dynamical analysis also indicates that some of the N-rich stars are likely to be halo interlopers, which suggests that halo contamination is not insignificant within the bulge area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available