4.7 Article

The effect of gas accretion on the radial gas metallicity profile of simulated galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 3, Pages 2827-2843

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1334

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientfficas y Tcnicas (CONICET, Argentina)
  2. Endeavour Scholarships and Fellowships
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence [CE170100013]
  4. Danish National Research Foundation
  5. CONICET [PIP-0387]
  6. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICT-2013-0317]
  7. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina [11-G150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the effect of the gas accretion rate ((M) over dot)(accr)) on the radial gas metallicity profile (RMP) of galaxies using the eagle cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, focusing on central galaxies of stellar mass M-* greater than or similar to 10(9) M-circle dot at z <= 1. We find clear relations between (M) over dot)(accr) and the slope of the RMP (measured within an effective radius), where higher (M) over dot)(accr) are associated with more negative slopes. The slope of the RMPs depends more strongly on (M) over dot)(accr) than on stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), or gas fraction, suggesting (M) over dot)(accr) to be a more fundamental driver of the RMP slope of galaxies. We find that eliminating the dependence on stellar mass is essential for pinning down the properties that shape the slope of the RMP. Although (M) over dot)(accr) is the main property modulating the slope of the RMP, we find that it causes other correlations that are more easily testable observationally: At fixed stellar mass, galaxies with more negative RMP slopes tend to have higher gas fractions and SFRs, while galaxies with lower gas fractions and SFRs tend to have flatter metallicity profiles within an effective radius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available