4.7 Article

Confirmed short periodic variability of subparsec supermassive binary black hole candidate Mrk 231

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 494, Issue 3, Pages 4069-4076

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa737

Keywords

galaxies: active; quasars: individual: Mrk 231; quasars: supermassive black holes

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia through the Astrophysical Spectroscopy of Extragalactic Objects [176001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11863007]
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. NSF [AST-1515927, AST-1908570, AST-0908816, AST-1413056]
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF5490]
  6. Ohio State University
  7. Mt. Cuba Astronomical Foundation
  8. Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at the Ohio State University
  9. Chinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for Astronomy (CASSACA)
  10. Villum Foundation
  11. George Skestos

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we confirm the short periodic variability of a subparsec supermassive binary black hole (SMBBH) candidate Mrk 231 in the extended optical photometric data set collected by the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS) and All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN). Using the Lomb-Scargle periodogram and 2DHybrid method, we detected the significant periodicity of similar to 1.1 yr beyond a damped random walk model in the CRTS+ASASSN optical data set. Mrk 231 has been previously proposed as an SMBBH candidate with a highly unequal mass ratio (q similar to 0.03), very tight mutual separation of similar to 590 au, and an orbital period of similar to 1.2 yr. Hence, our result further supports, even though not prove, the intriguing hypothesis that SMBBHs with low mass ratios may be more common than close-equal mass SMBBHs. This result, however, was obtained from the contribution of the CRTS data with limited sampling cadence and photometric accuracy, and further monitoring of Mrk 231 is crucial to confirm the periodicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available