4.7 Article

Searching for solar siblings in APOGEE and Gaia DR2 with N-body simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 494, Issue 2, Pages 2268-2279

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa788

Keywords

Sun: general; Galaxy: general; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; solar neighbourhood; galaxies: star clusters: general; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship-Doctoral
  3. NSERC [RGPIN-2015-05235]
  4. Ontario Early Researcher Award [ER16-12-061]
  5. Dunlap Fellowship at the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics by the Dunlap family
  6. University of Toronto
  7. Simons Foundation
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  10. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We make use of APOGEE and Gaia data to identify stars that are consistent with being born in the same association or star cluster as the Sun. We limit our analysis to stars that match solar abundances within their uncertainties, as they could have formed from the same giant molecular cloud (GMC) as the Sun. We constrain the range of orbital actions that solar siblings can have with a suite of simulations of solar birth clusters evolved in static and time-dependent tidal fields. The static components of each galaxy model are the bulge, disc, and halo, while the various time-dependent components include a bar, spiral arms, and GMCs. In galaxy models without GMCs, simulated solar siblings all have J(R) < 122 km s(-1) kpc, 990 < L-z < 1986 km s(-1) kpc, and 0.15 < J(z) < 0.58 km s(-1) kpc. Given the actions of stars in APOGEE and Gaia , we find 104 stars that fall within this range. One candidate in particular, Solar Sibling 1, has both chemistry and actions similar enough to the solar values that strong interactions with the bar or spiral arms are not required for it to be dynamically associated with the Sun. Adding GMCs to the potential can eject solar siblings out of the plane of the disc and increase their J(z), resulting in a final candidate list of 296 stars. The entire suite of simulations indicate that solar siblings should have J(R) < 122 km s(-1) kpc, 353 < L-z < 2110 km s(-1) kpc, and J(z) < 0.8 km s(-1) kpc. Given these criteria, it is most likely that the association or cluster that the Sun was born in has reached dissolution and is not the commonly cited open cluster M67.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available