4.6 Article

Understanding the Structure and Dynamics of Nanocellulose-Based Composites with Neutral and Ionic Poly(methacrylate) Derivatives Using Inelastic Neutron Scattering and DFT Calculations

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071689

Keywords

bacterial nanocellulose; nanocomposites; poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); poly(methacroylcholine chloride); poly(methacroylcholine hydroxide); inelastic neutron scattering; DFT calculations

Funding

  1. FCT/MEC [UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020]
  2. FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement
  3. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [IF/01468/2015]
  4. Scientific Employment Stimulus [CEECIND/00263/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial nanocellulose (BC)-based composites containing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA), poly(methacroylcholine chloride) (PMACC) or poly(methacroylcholine hydroxide) (PMACH) were characterized by inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectroscopy, combined with DFT (density functional theory) calculations of model systems. A reasonable match between calculated and experimental spectral lines and their intensities was used to support the vibrational assignment of the observed bands and to validate the possible structures. The differences between the spectra of the nanocomposites and the pure precursors indicate that interactions between the components are stronger for the ionic poly(methacrylate) derivatives than for the neutral counterpart. Displaced anions interact differently with cellulose chains, due to the different ability to compete with the O-H center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bonds in cellulose. Hence, the INS is an adequate technique to delve deeper into the structure and dynamics of nanocellulose-based composites, confirming that they are true nanocomposite materials instead of simple mixtures of totally independent domains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available