4.7 Article

Safety, Tumor Reduction, and Clinical Impact of Zika Virus Injection in Dogs with Advanced-Stage Brain Tumors

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1276-1286

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.03.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FAPESP-CEPID [2013/08028-1]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  3. CNPq, Brazil [309206/2011-1, 444722/2014-9]
  4. INCT-CETGEN, Brazil [573633/2008-8]
  5. FINEP-CTC, Brazil [0108057900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant brain tumors are among the most aggressive cancers with poor prognosis and no effective treatment. Recently, we reported the oncolytic potential of Zika virus infecting and destroying the human central nervous system (CNS) tumors in vitro and in immunodeficient mice model. However, translating this approach to humans requires pre-clinical trials in another immunocompetent animal model. Here, we analyzed the safety of Brazilian Zika virus (ZIKV(BR)) intrathecal injections in three dogs bearing spontaneous CNS tumors aiming an anti-tumoral therapy. We further assessed some aspects of the innate immune and inflammatory response that triggers the anti-tumoral response observed during the ZIKV(BR) administration in vivo and in vitro. For the first time, we showed that there were no negative clinical side effects following ZIKV(BR) CNS injections in dogs, confirming the safety of the procedure. Furthermore, the intrathecal ZIKV(BR) injections reduced tumor size in immunocompetent dogs bearing spontaneous intracranial tumors, improved their neurological clinical symptoms significantly, and extended their survival by inducing the destruction specifically of tumor cells, sparing normal neurons, and activating an immune response. These results open new perspectives for upcoming virotherapy using ZIKV to destroy and induce an anti-tumoral immune response in CNS tumors for which there are currently no effective treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available