4.6 Article

STAT3-dependent analysis reveals PDK4 as independent predictor of recurrence in prostate cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20199247

Keywords

OXPHOS; PDK4; prostate cancer; STAT3; TCA cycle

Funding

  1. COMET Competence Center CBmed-Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine [FA791A0906.FFG]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT)
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW)
  4. Land Steiermark (Department 12, Business and Innovation)
  5. Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG)
  6. Vienna Business Agency
  7. FWF [P26011]
  8. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Applied Metabolomics
  9. Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology
  10. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  11. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1213] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a broad spectrum of clinical behavior; hence, biomarkers are urgently needed for risk stratification. Here, we aim to find potential biomarkers for risk stratification, by utilizing a gene co-expression network of transcriptomics data in addition to laser-microdissected proteomics from human and murine prostate FFPE samples. We show up-regulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in PCa on the transcriptomic level and up-regulation of the TCA cycle/OXPHOS on the proteomic level, which is inversely correlated to STAT3 expression. We hereby identify gene expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), a key regulator of the TCA cycle, as a promising independent prognostic marker in PCa. PDK4 predicts disease recurrence independent of diagnostic risk factors such as grading, staging, and PSA level. Therefore, low PDK4 is a promising marker for PCa with dismal prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available