4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Towards molecular simulations that are transparent, reproducible, usable by others, and extensible (TRUE)

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
Volume 118, Issue 9-10, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2020.1742938

Keywords

Molecular dynamics; Monte Carlo simulation; reproducibility; open-source

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR072679] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systems composed of soft matter (e.g. liquids, polymers, foams, gels, colloids, and most biological materials) are ubiquitous in science and engineering, but molecular simulations of such systems pose particular computational challenges, requiring time and/or ensemble-averaged data to be collected over long simulation trajectories for property evaluation. Performing a molecular simulation of a soft matter system involves multiple steps, which have traditionally been performed by researchers in a 'bespoke' fashion, resulting in many published soft matter simulations not being reproducible based on the information provided in the publications. To address the issue of reproducibility and to provide tools for computational screening, we have been developing the open-sourceMolecularSimulation andDesignFramework (MoSDeF) software suite. In this paper, we propose a set of principles to createTransparent,Reproducible,Usable by others, andExtensible (TRUE) molecular simulations. MoSDeF facilitates the publication and dissemination of TRUE simulations by automating many of the critical steps in molecular simulation, thus enhancing their reproducibilitya. We provide several examples of TRUE molecular simulations: All of the steps involved in creating, running and extracting properties from the simulations are distributed on open-source platforms (within MoSDeF and on GitHub), thus meeting the definition of TRUE simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available