4.1 Article

Laparoscopic totally intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement: a multi-institutional study

Journal

MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 119-126

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1762094

Keywords

Laparoscopy; ureter reimplantation; ileal ureter; ureteral strictures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proves the feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic totally intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR) through a multicenter patient cohort with long-term follow-up. LIUR is a viable and repeatable method for restoring long ureteral defects.
Objective: To prove the feasibility, as well as the reproducibility of laparoscopic totally intracorporeal ileal ureter replacement (LIUR), by presenting a multicenter patient cohort with a long follow-up. Material and methods: Records of patients undergoing different types of ureteral replacements have been collected. Follow-up included a chemical profile and urine cultures. Imaging consisted of renal ultrasonography and excretory urography, as well as a cystography or an isotopic renography when indicated. Results: Forty patients were included in the study. Twelve underwent a right, 20 a left, and eight a bilateral laparoscopic ureteral replacement. The mean procedure time was 335 (150-680) minutes and the mean estimated blood loss was 221 (50-400) mL. Only three patients presented intraoperative complications, which were managed immediately, and three patients presented a Clavien III postoperative complication. Abdominal drains and nephrostomy tubes were removed after 24-36 h and 7-10 days, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 13.5 (10-35) days. Follow-up was at least six months. Conclusions: LIUR constitutes a feasible and reproducible method for the restoration of long ureteral defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available