4.6 Article

PAT-based design of agrochemical co-crystallization processes: A case-study for the selective crystallization of 1:1 and 3:2 co-crystals of p-toluenesulfonamideitriphenylphosphine oxide

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 95-108

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.06.005

Keywords

Co-crystallization; Co-crystal; Stoichiometric; Process analytical technologies

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/I033459/1]
  2. Centre for Continuous Innovation in Continuous Manufacturing and Crystallization (CMAC)
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC Grant [280106-CrySys]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF), USA
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I033459/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/I033459/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the selective crystallization and characterization of the stoichiometric forms of the p-to-luenesulfonamide/triphenylphosphine oxide (p-TSA-TPPO) co-crystal system in acetonitrile (MeCN) is demonstrated using batch and semi-batch crystallizers. In the batch study, both 1:1 and 3:2 p-TSA-TPPO were successfully isolated as pure forms. However, process variability was observed in a few experimental runs. To address the batch process variability issue, a control strategy was implemented using temperature cycling, aided by in situ process analytical technologies (PAT) to convert from 3:2 to 1:1 p-TSA-TPPO. In the semi-batch co-crystallization studies, the two molecular co-formers, p-TSA and TPPO, were dissolved in MeCN and pumped separately to the crystallizer. Changing the flow rates of the respective active ingredients allowed control over the co-crystallization outcome, and presents as a promising opportunity for development of a continuous co-crystallization process. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available