4.3 Article

Glutaraldehyde-crosslinking chitosan scaffolds reinforced with calcium phosphate spray-dried granules for bone tissue applications

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110557

Keywords

Bone tissue engineering; Chitosan Scaffold; Glutaraldehyde Spray-dried granules; Hydroxyapatite; beta-TCP

Funding

  1. FCT [UID/CTM/50011/2019]
  2. FCT/MCTES [UID/QUI/50006/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical demand for bone scaffolds as an alternative strategy for bone grafting has increased exponentially and, up to date, numerous formulations have been proposed to regenerate the bone tissue. However, most of these structures lack at least one of the fundamental/ideal properties of these materials (e.g., mechanical resistance, interconnected porosity, bioactivity, biodegradability, etc.). In this work, we developed innovative composite scaffolds, based on crosslinked chitosan with glutaraldehyde (GA), combined with different atomized calcium phosphates (CaP) granules - hydroxyapatite (HA) or biphasic mixtures of HA and beta- tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP), with improved biomechanical behavior and enhanced biological response. This innovative combination was designed to improve the scaffolds' functionality, in which GA improved chitosan mechanical strength and stability, whereas CaP granules enhanced the scaffolds' bioactivity and osteoblastic response, further reinforcing the scaffolds' structure. The biological assessment of the composite scaffolds showed that the specimens with 0.2% crosslinking were the ones with the best biological performance. In addition, the inclusion of biphasic granules induced a trend for increase osteogenic activation, as compared to the addition of HA granules. In conclusion, scaffolds produced in the present work, both with HA granules or the biphasic ones, and with low concentrations of GA, have shown adequate properties and enhanced biological performance, being potential candidates for application in bone tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available