4.6 Article

Thickness dependent structural, electrical and optical properties of cubic SnS thin films

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122831

Keywords

Thin films; Tin sulfide; Structural properties; Optical absorption; Band gap

Funding

  1. University of the Punjab, Lahore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the thickness dependent structural, optical and electrical properties of tin monosulfide (SnS) films. SnS films of different thickness were grown (at 24 degrees C) by chemical bath deposition. Films of different thicknesses were obtained by varying the number of deposition cycles (2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 cycles; one cycle =4.25 h). All films were examined by employing different experimental techniques. XRD results showed the occurrence of cubic p-phase in all films. FTIR spectra confirmed the occurrence of main peaks corresponding to Sn-S bond stretching in all films. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis of all films showed non-uniform grain distribution with porous surface morphology. Surface roughness was found to increase (32 +/- 1 nm to 72 +/- 1 nm) with increase in film thickness. Optical measurements showed that the films exhibited direct energy band gap, Eg. The Eg was found to increase from 1.70 eV to 1.74 eV with increase (374 +/- 5 nm to 723 +/- 8 nm) in film thickness. All films exhibited high absorption coefficient alpha (>= 10(4) cm(-1)) in the visible region. Film with lower thickness (374 nm) exhibited higher absorption coefficient. Electrical measurement of the films revealed that the electrical resistivity rho had strong dependence on film thickness. The electrical resistivity rho was found to increase (1.592 x 10(3) Omega cm to 1.785. 10(4) Omega cm) with increase in film thickness. All results suggested that the optical response and electrical conductivity could be tuned through appropriate choice of film thickness by maintaining the cubic structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available