4.6 Article

Experimental investigation on pressure drop and heat transfer in metal foam filled tubes under convective boundary condition

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 438-448

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.031

Keywords

Experiment; Metal foam; Heat transfer; Pressure drop

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51236007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat transfer under convective boundary condition is common in heat exchangers. This paper presented the experimental results of air flow and heat transfer through three stainless steel foam filled tubes under convection boundary condition. The air flow velocity inside the tube is relatively high, which varied from 7.0 to 26.0 m/s. The stainless steel foam filled tubes, manufactured using high-temperature metallic sintering technique, are of different pore densities (10, 30 and 70 PPI) but have the same porosity of 0.93. The air pressure drop through the stainless steel foam filled tubes was measured. It was found that the inertial drag is the dominant part of the pressure drop at higher velocity. The pressure drop experimental data under high velocity were compared to the predictions by the correlations obtained under relatively low velocity and great discrepancies have been found. A new correlation for the pressure drop through metal foams under high velocity was presented. The effect of the boundary condition on the heat transfer performance was addressed by the comparison of Nusselt number obtained in the present study with that obtained under constant heat flux boundary condition in the published investigation. It was found that the Nusselt number obtained under convective boundary condition is much lower than that obtained under constant heat flux boundary condition. A new correlation for Nusselt number under convective boundary condition was developed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available