4.5 Article

Size fractionation and bioavailability of iron released from melting sea ice in a subpolar marginal sea

Journal

MARINE CHEMISTRY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103774

Keywords

Iron; Sea ice; Bioavailability; Size fraction

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, Japan [17H00775, 26281002, 15H05820]
  2. Canon Foundation, Japan
  3. Green Network of Excellent Program (GRENE Program), Arctic Climate Change Research Project, Japan
  4. Grant for Joint Research Program of the Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Japan
  5. Tsuneichi Fujii Scholarship based on an exchange program at the University of Tasmania, Australia
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26281002, 15H05820, 17H00775] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We incubated Fe-limited seawater with sea-ice sections to evaluate which forms of iron (Fe) released from melting sea ice can favor phytoplankton growth. Biological availability (bioavailability) was approximated by fractionating Fe into soluble (<1000 kDa), colloidal (1000 kDa-0.2 mu m), and labile particulate (> 0.2 mu m) sizes. Results show that phytoplankton thrived after the addition of sea ice. While the labile particulate fraction dominated the total Fe pool in sea ice, the concentration of dissolved Fe (< 0.2 mu m) was likely not enough to support phytoplankton growth in seawater over time. The concentrations and molar ratios of Fe, Mn and Al in acid-digested particles indicate that particulate Fe in sea ice were derived from multiple origins. Specifically, the Fe to Al ratio in sea ice was higher than in lithogenic material, suggesting that the sea ice were enriched with biogenic material. Our study suggests that particulate Fe from sea ice should be considered an important source of biologically available Fe in ice-covered marginal seas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available