4.3 Article

Standardization and Feasibility of Voice Range Profile Measurements in Epidemiological Studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF VOICE
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.014

Keywords

Voice range profile; Standard operating procedure; Fundamental frequency; Interobserver variability; Feasibility; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. Free State of Saxony within the framework of the excellence initiative [713-241202, 14505/2470, 14575/2470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate different examination methods and the effects of interobserver variability on voice range profile (VRP) measurements. A standard operating procedure (SOP) suitable for epidemiological studies was proposed, and its feasibility was tested. The results showed that manual recording method took longer time but resulted in lower values of some VRP parameters, while giving instructions and advice during recording led to higher values of certain parameters. Overall, the SOP proved to be feasible in the context of an epidemiological study.
Objectives. The voice range profile (VRP) is composed of the speaking VRP (spVRP) and the singing VRP (siVRP). Different examination methods of VRP and effects of interobserver variability were evaluated to define a standard operating procedure (SOP) suitable for the specific use in epidemiological studies. Subsequently the feasibility of the SOP was investigated in a larger number of participants. Study design. Cross-sectional study. Methods. In a first phase both the spVRP and the siVRP of 51 female students were measured by four differently experienced examiners. Using a cross-over study design the effects of two different recording methods (manual vs automatic) and three different types of instructions given by the examiner (none vs before vs during recording) were investigated. In a second phase, the SOP for VRP recording was tested in the framework of a feasibility study in 110 (55 female and 55 male) participants. Results. The average total investigation time was significantly (P = 0.001) higher for the manual recording method (6.1 minutes +/- 1.0) in comparison to the automated (5.5 minutes +/- 0.7) recording method. The manual recording method led to significantly lower values of minimum frequency (F0min) (P = 0.013) and minimum intensity (SPLmin) (P < 0.001) and higher values of the maximum frequency (F0max) (P = 0.005) of the siVRP. The maximum phonation time, F0max, SPLmax of the siVRP and the frequency and intensity of the shouting voice (Level IV) of the spVRP showed significantly (P < 0.001) higher values when the examiner was allowed to give instructions and advise during the recording. Voice parameters of the siVRP did not show significant associations with the experience of the examiner. Conclusions. Standardization of VRP measurements is important to obtain correct and reproducible data in a reasonable examination time. The SOP proposed here proved to be feasible in the setting of an epidemiological study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available