4.6 Article

Prognostic impact of a ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages 1469-1480

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.107

Keywords

ground-glass opacity; pure-solid tumor; prognosis; clinical-T classification

Funding

  1. Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Funds [23-A-16, 23-A-18, 26-A-4, 29-A-3]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare [11S-2, 11S-4, 14S-2, 14S-4, 17S-2, 17S-5, 20S-2, 20S-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study validated the prognostic importance of ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA lung cancer and recommended considering it as an important parameter in the next clinical T classification.
Objective: We performed a validation study to confirm the prognostic importance of the presence of a ground-glass opacity component based on data of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, JCOG0201, which was a prospective observational study to predict the pathological noninvasiveness of clinical stage IA lung cancer in Japan. Methods: Among the 811 patients registered in JCOG0201, 671 were confirmed eligible by study monitoring and a central review of computed tomography. Registered c-stage IA lung cancer was less than 30 mm in maximum tumor size, which was classified into a with ground-glass opacity group (pure ground-glass opacity and part-solid tumor) or solid group based on the status of a ground-glass opacity component. T staging was reassigned in accordance with the 8th edition of the TNM staging system. To validate the prognostic impact, overall survival was estimated. Results: Of the cases, 432 (64%) were in the with ground-glass opacity group and 239 (36%) were in the solid group with a median follow-up time of 10.1 years. The 5-year overall survival was significantly different between the with ground-glass opacity group and solid group (95.1% vs 81.1%). The 5-year overall survival was excellent regardless of the solid component size in the with ground-glass opacity group (c-T1a or less: 97.2%, c-T1b: 93.4%, c-T1c: 91.7%). In contrast, prognostic impact of the tumor size was definitive in the solid group (c-T1a: 87.5%, c-T1b: 85.9%, c-T1c: 73.7%). Conclusions: Favorable prognostic impact of the presence of a ground-glass opacity component was demonstrated in JCOG0201. The presence or absence of a ground-glass opacity should be considered as an important parameter in the next clinical T classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available