4.7 Article

Treatment of strongly acidic wastewater with high arsenic concentrations by ferrous sulfide (FeS): Inhibitive effects of S(0)-enriched surfaces

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages 986-992

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.109

Keywords

High-arsenic wastewater; Acidity; FeS; As2S3; S(0)-enriched surfaces

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2010ZX07212-007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51422813, 512218920]
  3. Beijing Nova Program - 'China' [2013054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The utilization of arsenopyrite (FeAsS), the As ore mineral, produces strongly acidic wastewater with extremely high arsenic (As) concentrations. This study investigates the feasibility of using ferrous sulfide (FeS) as a sulfide [S(-II)] source to treat strongly acidic wastewater with high concentrations of arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)]. The removal of As(III) by FeS was nearly 30% higher than that of As(V), and higher acidity and elevated FeS doses benefited their removal. At extremely high acidity of above 7 mol/L as H2SO4, the consumption of S(-II) by H2SO4 inhibited As removal. At lower acidity of below 2 mol/L as H2SO4, elevated FeS doses up to 4 times the theoretical dose could achieve good As removal. SEM/EDS and XPS analysis indicated the formation of As2S3 precipitates, and sulfur [S(0)] also formed in the As(V)removing system. The tiny and negatively-charged S(0) particles tend to coat the FeS surface. The S(0) enriched surface acts as a barrier to inhibit S(-II) detachment and As(V) penetration and inhibits As(V) removal thereafter. The reduction of As(V) to As(III) by Na2S, prior to dosing with FeS, is preferred to achieve rapid and favorable As(V) removal. The low-cost FeS provides available Fe(II) and S(-II) for As removal, and is practically valuable to treat acidic high-As wastewater. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available