4.7 Article

Coupled Cu(II)-EDTA degradation and Cu(II) removal from acidic wastewater by ozonation: Performance, products and pathways

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 299, Issue -, Pages 23-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.044

Keywords

Ozone; Cu-EDTA; Acidic wastewater; HO center dot; Advanced oxidation process

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578280, 21307057]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07206-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effective removal of toxic metal-organic ligand complexes from contaminated water is still a challenging task. Here, we found that ozonation could achieve efficient degradation of Cu(II)-EDTA and simultaneous removal of Cu(II) from acidic solution (pH 3.1-6.3) as well as from an electroplating effluent (pH 3.6). A complete Cu-EDTA and 75-80% of TOC removal could be achieved from a synthetic solution at the initial Cu(II) of 64 mg L-1 and ozone dosage of 30 mg min(-1) L-1. The acidic pH changed to circumneutral during ozonation, resulting in 90-97% of Cu(II) removal through precipitation finally. HO center dot-mediated oxidation was predominantly responsible for the degradation of Cu-EDTA, as proved by the radical scavenging experiments and electron paramagnetic resonance. Based on the evolution of HPLC spectra and HPLC-MS analysis, a stepwise decarboxylation (i.e., cleavage of N-C bond) was found to responsible for the ozonation of Cu-EDTA, where six intermediates/products were identified. Thus, a plausible mechanism involving decarboxylation followed by Cu(II) precipitation was proposed. Ozonation could also realize efficient removal of Cu(II)-EDTA, Cu(II) and TOC from a realistic electroplating effluent. We believe this study would provide a simple and promising option for water decontamination from toxic metal-organic ligand complexes. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available