4.7 Article

A3Y2Ge3O12 (A = Ca, Mg): Two novel microwave dielectric ceramics with contrasting τf and Q x f

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 3989-3995

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.04.052

Keywords

Garnet structure; Ionic occupation; Lowr; Bond valence

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21965009, 21761008]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2018GXNSFAA138175, 2018GXNSFBA281093]
  3. Project of Scientific Research and Technical Exploitation Program of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [AA18118008, AA18118034, AA18118023]
  4. Project of Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2018KY0255]
  5. High Level Innovation Team and Outstanding Scholar Program of Guangxi Institutes, and Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education [YCBZ2020167, YCBZ2020066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

( )Two garnet-structured microwave dielectric ceramics of A(3)Y(2)Ge(3)O(12) (A = Ca, Mg; called CYG and MYG, respectively) were synthesized. CYG was crystallized in a normal cubic garnet structure with Ca-2(+) fully occupying the dodecahedral (A) site, whereas MYG was an inverse garnet with mixed distribution of Mg-2(+)/Y-3(+) at the A site. The difference in ionic occupation resulted in anomalies in microwave dielectric properties, with dielectric constant (epsilon(r)) = 14.1, quality factor (Q x f) = 12,600 GHz and positive temperature coefficient of resonant frequency (tau(f)) =120.5 ppm/degrees C for MYG ceramic and epsilon(r) = 10.8, Q x f = 97,126 GHz and tau(f) = - 40.6 ppm/degrees C for CYG ceramic. The large deviations in measured epsilon(r) from theoretical epsilon(th), possibly resulted from the garnet structural constraints leading to 'rattling' Mg-2(+) and Y-3(+) in A site of MYG. Infrared reflectivity spectra analysis revealed ion polarization contributed mostly to the permittivity of both ceramics in microwave frequency ranges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available