4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 15, Pages 1758-1769

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046

Keywords

aortic stenosis; flow rate; low flow; low gradient; outcome; prognosis

Funding

  1. St. Vincent's Clinic Foundation Traveling Fellowship Award
  2. Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  3. Connect Talent Research Chair from Region Pays de la Loire
  4. Nantes Metropole
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [FDN-143225, MOP-114997]
  6. Foundation of the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute
  7. Edwards Lifesciences
  8. Medtronic
  9. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL092101, U01 HL088942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Aortic valve area (AVA) <= 1.0 cm(2) is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS. METHODS In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients. RESULTS Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (<= 242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA <= 1.0 cm(2) was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s. CONCLUSIONS Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available