4.7 Article

Electrochemical oxidation of cinnamic acid with Mo modified PbO2 electrode: Electrode characterization, kinetics and degradation pathway

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 289, Issue -, Pages 239-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.054

Keywords

Transition metal; Cinnamic acid; Electrochemical oxidation; PbO2 electrode; Degradation mechanism

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY13E080017]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20113317120004]
  3. National Engineering Research Center for Process Development of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients [2013FU125X01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel molybdenum modified PbO2 electrode was successfully prepared with the method of electrode position. The SEM and XRD were employed to study the surface morphology of electrodes, which indicated that the modified PbO2 electrode had a larger effective area and more compact film. Electrochemical degradation of cinnamic acid (CA) in aqueous solution with Mo-PbO2 electrode and PbO2 electrode were investigated. The results showed that the Mo-PbO2 electrode had a better effect of CA removal. The operational parameters influencing the electrochemical degradation of CA with Mo-PbO2 electrode were optimized and the results revealed that the electrochemical degradation of CA followed the pseudo-first-order kinetics and the optimal removal of CA and COD were 85.51% and 25.79% after 120 min on condition of the electrolyte concentration, initial concentration of CA, current density and initial value of pH were 0.1 mol/L, 300 mg/L, 10 mA/cm(2) and 3.4, respectively. The degradation mechanism of CA in electrochemical oxidation with Mo-PbO2 electrode was analyzed and the main degradation pathway of CA was proposed based on the intermediates identified by IC and GC-MS. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available