4.7 Article

Pursuit of urine nitrifying granular sludge for decentralised nitrite production and sewer gas control

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 289, Issue -, Pages 17-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.071

Keywords

Nitrifying aerobic granules; Selection pressure; pH; Free ammonia; Urine source separation; Microbial competition

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [611607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a high-rate reactor for decentralised urine nitrification using granular sludge, which allows high biomass retention in a small footprint installation. The system incorporated alkalinity dosing to ensure full conversion of ammonia to nitrite for subsequent control of sewer gas production. The key operational parameters for granule formation such as feeding and settling duration were tested as well as environmental conditions including pH. Pulse feeding was found to be instrumental to both the treatment performance and development of well settling granule-like aggregates. These aggregates showed granular characteristics with a compact and well defined shape, excellent settleability and high strength. However, pulse feeding also led to increased pH and free ammonia concentrations which reduced heterotroph activity and aggregate growth. Furthermore, in order to prevent nitrification collapse and high pH and free ammonia associated with such an event the reactor nitrogen loading was limited. Due to the low organic to nitrogen ratio of urine this restrained the organics loading of the dominant heterotrophic community further limiting granule growth. Nevertheless, the development of compact well settling aggregates under pulse feed operation allowed the objective of high-rate nitrification to be achieved with sustained nitritation rates up to 1.1 kg-N/m(3) d at a urine dilution of approximately 25%. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available