4.6 Article

Initial validation of the product of the signs global assessment and body surface area in atopic dermatitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 283-289

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.095

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The SGA X BSA showed strong correlations with various indicators of atopic dermatitis severity in clinical practice, indicating its validity and feasibility as a measurement tool.
Background: Current valid instruments that measure the signs of atopic dermatitis in clinical trials may not be suitable for clinical practice because of their complexity. The product of a clinician-derived 5-point signs global assessment and body surface area (SGA X BSA) may represent a simple approach to quickly assess the severity of signs in patients with atopic dermatitis in clinical practice. Objectives: Evaluate the basic measurement properties of the SGA X BSA. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with atopic dermatitis treated in an outpatient dermatology clinic at Oregon Health & Science University from 2015 to 2018 who had a recorded BSA and SGA. Results: We identified 138 patients completing 325 clinic visits. SGA X BSA demonstrated strong and statistically significant (P < .001) correlations with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (r = 0.91, n = 19), average daily pruritus (r = 0.71, n = 177), patient global assessment (r = 0.74, n = 170), and a derived global scale composed of the average of 4 signs rated between 0 and 3 (r = 0.77, n = 282). Acceptability, responsiveness, and floor or ceiling effects of the measure were deemed adequate. Severity banding was maximized at 1, 21, and 87 (kappa = 0.4902). Limitations: The patient cohort was gathered exclusively from a tertiary care clinic setting in the Pacific Northwest and lacked ethnic diversity. Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that SGA X BSA is a valid and feasible instrument for atopic dermatitis signs in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available