4.7 Article

Net-like molybdenum selenide-acetylene black supported on Ni foam for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes and hydrogen evolution reaction

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages 437-445

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.074

Keywords

Transition metal dichalcogenides-based nanostructures; Molybdenum selenide-acetylene black; High-performance supercapacitors; Hydrogen evolution reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1304214, 21475115]
  2. Program for University Innovative Research Team of Henan [15IRTSTHN001]
  3. Henan Provincial Science and technology innovation team [C20150026]
  4. Nanhu Scholars Program of XYNU
  5. University Students Sustentation Fund of Xinyang Normal University [2015-DXS-157]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) transition metal dichalcogenides-based nanostructures composed of nanosheets have recently attracted significant interest for energy storage devices such as supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries. Herein, a facile hydrothermal strategy is applied to prepare net-like MoSe2-acetylene black (AB), tailoring the interior structure by Ni substrate. The 3D MoSe2-AB nanostructures constructed with MoSe2 ultrathin nanosheets are applied as supercapacitors electrode materials. As expected, the net-like MoSe2-AB composites exhibit a high specific capacitance (2020 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) and good cycling stability (107.5% after 1500 cycles) due to their unique architecture. The MoSe2-AB composites also show highly electrocatalytic ability for hydrogen evolution reaction (0.08 V of onset potential and similar to 55 mV dec(-1) of Tafel slope). The developed method can be extended to the preparation of other MoSe2-based materials and used in other applications, such as sensors, Li-ion battery or oxygen reduction reaction. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available