4.5 Article

Dummy template surface molecularly imprinted polymers based on silica gel for removing imidacloprid and acetamiprid in tea polyphenols

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 43, Issue 12, Pages 2467-2476

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201901268

Keywords

acetamiprid; dummy templates; imidacloprid; molecularly imprinted polymer; tea polyphenols

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFD0400803]
  2. Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX(18)2025-01]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31772086]
  4. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2017QNRC001]
  5. Food Science and Engineering National First-class Discipline Construction Project [JUFSTR20180204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dummy template surface molecularly imprinted polymers based on silica gel were prepared through the surface molecular imprinting technique. Nonpoisonous nicotinamide, which is a structural analogue of imidacloprid and acetamidine, was chosen as the dummy template molecule. The obtained polymers were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The results showed that the polymers exhibited high adsorption capacity and selectivity for imidacloprid and acetamiprid. The maximum adsorption capacities of the polymers toward imidacloprid and acetamiprid were 42.05 and 22.99 mg/g, and the adsorption could reach binding equilibrium within 150 min. The polymers were successfully applied as column-filling materials to extract imidacloprid and acetamiprid from tea polyphenols with a relatively high removal rate (92.36 and 95.20%). The polymers also showed great stability and reusability during the application. The obtained polymers possessed good application prospects for removing imidacloprid and acetamiprid in tea polyphenol production processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available