4.5 Article

The effect of root hairs on rhizosphere phosphatase activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
Volume 183, Issue 3, Pages 382-388

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201900426

Keywords

barley (Hordeum vulgare L; ); enzyme activity; phosphorus; rhizosphere imaging; soil moisture

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [CA 921/3-1, KU 1184/33-1, SP1389/6-1]
  2. Studienwerk Villigst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Phosphatases in soil are of great importance for plant P acquisition. It is hypothesized that root hairs increase rhizosphere phosphatase activity as they release enzymes into soil and stimulate microbial activity. Methods: To test the effect of root hairs on soil phosphatase activity, we grew barley (Hordeum vulgare 'Pallas') wild type and its root-hairless mutant in rhizoboxes and determined phosphatase activity using soil zymography. Measurements were done at three moisture levels (30, 15, and 5% VWC). Rhizosphere phosphatase activity was estimated for the two genotypes and two locations along the root [root tip region (0-4 cm behind tip) and mature roots (> 7 cm behind tip)]. Results: Rhizosphere phosphatase activity was similar in the two locations along the root (root tip region vs. mature root parts). In contrast, rhizosphere phosphatase extension was two times larger for the root tip region of the wild type than for the mutant at 30% and 15% VWC. However, as phosphatase activities at the root surface of tips and mature root parts were slightly higher for the mutant than for the wild type, average enzyme activities were unaffected by the genotype. Conclusions: We conclude that the mutant seems to compensate for the lack of root hairs by increased phosphatase activity close to the root surface. However, the increased rhizosphere phosphatase extension for the wild type may be equally efficient as it allows P mobilization and uptake from large soil volumes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available