4.3 Article

Growth performance of Alexandrium catenella from the Chilean fjords under different environmental drivers: plasticity as a response to a highly variable environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 119-134

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbaa011

Keywords

Alexandrium catenella; phenotypic plasticity; reaction norms; variable environment; abiotic drivers

Funding

  1. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT) [1080548, 1130954]
  2. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
  3. Proyecto Interno [FNI02/16 ULA CR8520]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alexandrium catenella, the main species associated with harmful algal blooms, has progressively increased its distribution through one of the most extensive and highly variable fjord systems in the world. In order to understand this successful expansion, we evaluated the effects of different salinities, light intensity, temperatures, nitrogen (N) forms and nitrogen/phosphate (N:P) ratio levels on the growth performance, using clones isolated from different locations across its wide geographic distribution. Results showed that the growth responses were plastic and, in some cases, different reaction norms among clones were observed. Despite plasticity, the optimal growth of A. catenella (i.e. highest growth rate and highest maximal cells density) was reached within a narrow thermal range (12-15 degrees C), while salinity (20-30 PSU) and light intensity (20-120 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) ranges were wider. These results are partially consistent with the highest cell densities recorded in the field. Furthermore, optimal growth was reached using reduced forms of nitrogen (i.e. urea and NH4+) and in unbalanced N:P ratios (18:1 and 30:1). These characteristics likely allow A. catenella to grow in highly variable environmental conditions and might partly explain the recent expansion of this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available