4.6 Article

Rediscovering Tuning Product Selectivity by an Energy Descriptor: CH4 Formation and C1-C1 Coupling on the FCC Co Surface

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 124, Issue 20, Pages 11040-11049

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02537

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21736007, 21872162, U1710104, 21703273]
  2. Transformational Technologies for Clean Energy and Demonstration
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA 21020202]
  4. ShanXi Provincial Research Foundation for Basic Research [201701D221242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite extensive research work, how to control the chain growth by C-1-C-1 coupling on the catalysts of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) remains an unsolved problem. The activity, chain growth, and selectivity of FTS had been investigated on Co(111), (100), (311), and (110) surfaces with spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) calculations. It is clearly shown that the CO activity decreases in the order of Co(110) > Co(311) > Co(100) > Co(111). Surface carbon is successively hydrogenated to CH4 or undergoes chain growth to form heavier hydrocarbons. The effective barrier difference as a descriptor was introduced to evaluate the selectivity of CH4 formation and C-1-C-1 coupling. According to the effective barriers difference, the Co(100) surface has high selectivity toward C-1-C-1 coupling, which is attributed to the active site containing two 4-fold hollow sites. The Co(110) surface has the highest selectivity of CH4 formation. Moreover, it is revealed that the exposed specific cobalt crystal plane could tune the FTS selectivity to higher CO activity and lower CH4 selectivity. This work highlights the effects of surfaces and active sites on catalytic selectivity and promotes the design of Co-based catalysts of FTS with high selectivity for long-chain hydrocarbons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available