4.6 Article

Efficacy of a Primary Care-Based Intervention to Promote Parent-Teen Communication and Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 200-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.050

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. John Templeton Foundation
  2. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [T71MC30798]
  3. Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award Research Center (NIH/NCATS) [UL1TR000003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the impact of a primary care-based, parent-directed intervention on changes in parent-teen communication, parental beliefs about adolescents, parent and adolescent well-being, adolescent distress, and adolescent positive affect from baseline to 2-month follow-up. Study design In this randomized controlled trial, 120 adolescents (13-15 years of age) scheduled for well visits and their parents were randomized to the strength intervention or control group. The intervention included a booklet highlighting 3 key messages about adolescence, instructions to have a discussion with their teen about each other's strengths, and clinician endorsement. Outcomes were assessed before the well visit and 2 months later. Results Adolescents were 61% female and 65% black. Parents were primarily female (97%); 72% had a 4-year degree or higher. The intervention had a positive impact on adolescent-reported open communication among adolescents with baseline low open communication scores (B = 3.55; P =.005; 95% CI, 1.07-6.03). Adolescents in the intervention group reported a decrease in distress (-1.54 vs 3.78; P =.05; partial eta squared [eta(2)] = 0.038) and increase in positive affect (1.30 vs -3.64; P =.05; eta(2) = 0.04) compared with control group adolescents. The intervention did not affect parent-reported communication, parental beliefs, or adolescent well-being. Control parents demonstrated a marginal increase in well-being, whereas intervention parents did not (0.82 vs -0.18; P =.07; eta(2) = 0.029). Conclusions This study highlights the potential impact of primary care-based, universal, low-intensity interventions targeting parents of adolescents on parent-teen communication and important adolescent health outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available