4.1 Article

Goal-Concordant Care in the Era of Advanced Stroke Therapies

Journal

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 297-301

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0667

Keywords

advance care planning; goals of care; hospital transfers; stroke; thrombectomy; withdrawal of interventions

Funding

  1. Northwestern's Physician-Scientist Training Program for Neurology
  2. National Institutes of Health [K76AG054782]
  3. Coleman Foundation
  4. University of Florida
  5. Instituto Nacional de Cancer
  6. American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
  7. Arnold P. Gold Foundation
  8. National Institute on Aging
  9. Seasons Hospice Foundation
  10. Woodstock
  11. HCSC Insurance Services Company
  12. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  13. Canadian Patient Safety Institute
  14. Health Research and Educational Trust
  15. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  16. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  17. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  18. Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
  19. Department of Veterans Affairs
  20. National Center for Research Resources
  21. NOVA Research Company
  22. Lance Armstrong Foundation
  23. Retirement Research Foundation
  24. Society for the Arts in Healthcare
  25. Medical College of Wisconsin
  26. National Institute of Nursing Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stroke is a major global cause of disability and death, and advances in treatment now allow for endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset to improve functional outcomes. Ensuring goal-concordant care in the era of acute stroke treatment advancements poses challenges in considering therapies like EVT in the context of comfort-focused care to prevent neurological disability and suffering at the end of life. Modifications to EVT evaluation workflows may facilitate timely resource allocation for cases requiring hospital-to-hospital transfers for advanced stroke care.
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Recent advances in stroke care now enable patients with severe ischemic stroke owing to large vessel occlusion to safely undergo endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) up to 24 hours since their time of last known well, with the goal of improving functional outcomes by recanalization of the occluded vessel and reperfusion of downstream ischemic brain tissue. The objective of this analysis is to highlight clinical and ethical challenges related to ensuring goal-concordant care in this era of unprecedented advances in acute stroke care. Specifically, there is a salient challenge of whether advanced therapies such as EVT may be justifiably considered comfort focused, given their potential to preempt accumulated neurologic disability and suffering at the end of life. Through the lens of a patient case, we discuss key challenges, lessons learned, and suggestions for future care and research endeavors at the intersection of acute stroke care and palliative care principles. Although therapies such as thrombolysis and EVT may be considered aggressive prima facie, their potential to ameliorate additional disability and potential suffering at the end of life prompt close consideration of the proper role of these therapies on a case-by-case basis in the context of comfort-focused care. Modification to the workflow for EVT evaluations may facilitate goal-concordant care and timely resource allocation, especially for cases that involve hospital-to-hospital transfers for advanced stroke care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available