4.1 Article

Brief Food Insecurity and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among WIC-Enrolled Families in the First 1,000 Days

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 52, Issue 8, Pages 796-800

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.03.006

Keywords

pregnancy; infant; food insecurity; sugar-sweetened beverages; drinking behavior

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) New Connections Grants through Healthy Eating Research Program (RWJF) [74198]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [K23DK115682, K01DK114383]
  3. RWJF Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program (RWJF) [74252]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Determine the association between household food insecurity and habitual sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-enrolled families during the first 1,000 days. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of pregnant women and mothers of infants aged under 2 years in the WIC was performed. Families recruited sequentially at consecutive visits completed food insecurity and beverage intake questionnaires; estimated logistic regression models controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Of 394 Hispanic/Latino mothers and 281 infants, 63% had household food insecurity. Food insecurity significantly increased odds of habitual maternal (unadjusted odds ratio (OR), 2.39; 95% CI, 1.27 -4.47; P=.01) and infant SSB consumption (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.15-3.65; P=.02), and the relationship was not attenuated by maternal age, education, or foreign-born status. Conclusions and Implications: Food insecurity increased odds of habitual SSB consumption in WIC families. Interventions to curb SSB consumption among WIC-enrolled families in the first 1,000 days in the context of household food insecurity are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available