4.0 Review

Temperature signaling underlying thermotaxis and cold tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS
Volume 34, Issue 3-4, Pages 351-362

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2020.1734001

Keywords

Caenorhabditis elegans; thermotaxis; cold tolerance; temperature sensation

Funding

  1. Asahi Glass Foundation
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  4. Hirao Taro Foundation of KONAN GAKUEN for Academic Research, AMED Mechano Biology [19gm5810024h0003, 20gm5810024h0004]
  5. KAKENHI from JSPS
  6. MEXT Japan [17K19410, 18H02484, 15H05928]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H05928, 17K19410, 18H02484] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caenorhabditis elegans has a simple nervous system of 302 neurons. It however senses environmental cues incredibly precisely and produces various behaviors by processing information in the neural circuit. In addition to classical genetic analysis, fluorescent proteins and calcium indicators enable in vivo monitoring of protein dynamics and neural activity on either fixed or free-moving worms. These analyses have provided the detailed molecular mechanisms of neuronal and systemic signaling that regulate worm responses. Here, we focus on responses of C. elegans against temperature and review key findings that regulate thermotaxis and cold tolerance. Thermotaxis of C. elegans has been studied extensively for almost 50 years, and cold tolerance is a relatively recent concept in C. elegans. Although both thermotaxis and cold tolerance require temperature sensation, the responsible neurons and molecular pathways are different, and C. elegans uses the proper mechanisms depending on its situation. We summarize the molecular mechanisms of the major thermosensory circuit as well as the modulatory strategy through neural and tissue communication that enables fine tuning of thermotaxis and cold tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available