4.4 Article

Lycium barbarum Polysaccharide Extracted from Lycium barbarum Leaves Ameliorates Asthma in Mice by Reducing Inflammation and Modulating Gut Microbiota

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL FOOD
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 699-710

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2019.4544

Keywords

asthma; gut microbiota; inflammation; Lycium barbarum polysaccharide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560258]
  2. Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Science and Technology Support Program [2015BY033]
  3. Ningxia Natural Science Fund Project [NZ17159, 2018A0402]
  4. Ningxia High School first-class Disciplines (West China firstclass Disciplines Basic Medical Sciences at Ningxia Medical University) [NXYLXK2017B07]
  5. Ningxia Medical University Special talent project [XT201401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to explore the impact of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP) on inflammation and gut microbiota in mice with allergic asthma. Mice were divided into four groups: control group, OVA (ovalbumin) group, Con+LBP group, OVA+LBP group. After 28 days of LBP intervention, mice were euthanized and associated indications were investigated. Histopathological examination demonstrated that LBP reduced lung injury. The results of our current study provide evidence that supplementation with LBP in asthmatic mice decreases TNF, IL-4, IL-6, MCP-1, and IL-17A in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Sequencing and analysis of gut microbiota indicated that compared with the OVA group, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were increased, but Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Alistipes, and Clostridiales were decreased in the OVA+LBP group. We also found that gut microbiota were related to inflammation-related factors. Therefore, we speculate that LBP may improve allergic asthma by altering gut microbiota and inhibiting inflammation in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available