4.7 Article

Evidence of increasing diversification of emerging Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 strains

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 10, Pages 2165-2172

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26018

Keywords

coalescent; coronavirus; evolution; SARS-CoV-2

Categories

Funding

  1. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay, Grupos I+D grant
  2. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion, Uruguay, Fondo Maria Vinas grant
  3. PEDECIBA, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On 30th January 2020, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia caused by a novel betacoronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a public health emergency of international concern by the World Health Organization. For this reason, a detailed evolutionary analysis of SARS-CoV-2 strains currently circulating in different geographic regions of the world was performed. A compositional analysis as well as a Bayesian coalescent analysis of complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 strains recently isolated in Europe, North America, South America, and Asia was performed. The results of these studies revealed a diversification of SARS-CoV-2 strains in three different genetic clades. Co-circulation of different clades in different countries, as well as different genetic lineages within different clades were observed. The time of the most recent common ancestor was established to be around 1st November 2019. A mean rate of evolution of 6.57 x 10(-4)substitutions per site per year was found. A significant migration rate per genetic lineage per year from Europe to South America was also observed. The results of these studies revealed an increasing diversification of SARS-CoV-2 strains. High evolutionary rates and fast population growth characterizes the population dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available