4.6 Article

Effect of selective distribution of MWCNTs on the solid-state rheological and dielectric properties of blends of PMMA and LDPE

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 55, Issue 20, Pages 8526-8540

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-04622-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte (Spain) [PRX15/00252]
  2. Vicerrectorado de Investigacion y Transferencia (Universidad de Huelva)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on the solid-state rheological and dielectric properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) were studied as a function of varying polymer ratio. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) was performed in torsion mode, on the blends and their composites with MWCNTs. For a PMMA/LDPE blend with a ratio of 80:20, the evolution of the loss tangent with temperature showed a single thermal event, associated with the glass transition (T-g) of PMMA, confirming that co-continuity has not been achieved. Upon loading with 2 wt.% MWCNTs, a decrease in the magnitude of this peak is observed. Even though the MWCNTs preferentially locate in the polymer phase first to melt, i.e., LDPE, selective solvent extraction on this sample demonstrated that some of the MWCNTs are trapped in the major phase, PMMA. Moreover, DMTA measurements also revealed the formation of a rheological percolated network at similar to 3.5 wt.% MWCNTs in PMMA/LDPE blends with polymer ratios of 50:50 and 20:80, but not in 80:20. In contrast, for the same MWCNT concentration, a 80:20 blend displayed a well-developed AC conductivity plateau at low frequencies and highly enhanced dielectric properties, as a consequence of the high concentration of micro-capacitors formed by polymer films sandwiched by nanotubes within the LDPE phase, as proven from atomic force microscopy observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available