4.2 Review

Integration or Modularity in the Mandible of Canids (Carnivora: Canidae): a Geometric Morphometric Approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAMMALIAN EVOLUTION
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 145-157

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-020-09502-z

Keywords

Carnivora; Canidae; Mandible; Integration; Modularity

Funding

  1. NSF [PICT 2014-1930, 2015-2389, 2015-0966, 2016-3151, 2016-3682, PUE 0125, DEB 1350474]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that the mandibular shape of canids is influenced by ecological factors, especially in highly specialized taxa. Macroevolutionary patterns are more integrated than intraspecific patterns, indicating that correlational selection plays a significant role in the evolution of mandibular form and function. There is no evidence of an evolutionary line of least resistance in shaping mandible disparity.
Understanding the interplay between morphological integration and modularity is considered an important topic in the study of the evolution of the form of complex structures. The mandible is a complex structure that can be shaped by diverse factors such as ontogeny, ecology, and evolutionary history. In canids, this is particularly interesting because they have a large diversity in feeding behavior and hunting strategy. Here, we employed geometric morphometric techniques to evaluate the balance between integration and modularity in 1011 mandibles of a sample of extinct and extant canids. The results show that allometric scaling seems to have little influence in determining the mandibular shape of canids. Some divergence associated with ecology was observed, especially for highly specialized taxa (hypercarnivores and insectivores). Finally, macroevolutionary patterns were more integrated than intraspecific patterns, suggesting that correlational selection might play a strong role in the evolution of mandibular form and function. We found no evidence of an evolutionary line of least resistance in shaping mandible disparity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available