4.7 Article

Noncontrast Radiomics Approach for Predicting Grades of Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 1124-1136

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27176

Keywords

pancreas; neuroendocrine tumors; magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm Grading; radiomics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1809205, 61771249, 81871352, 91959207]
  2. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [81701689, 81601468]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633714]
  4. Key Junior College of National Clinical of China, Shanghai Technology Innovation Project 2017 on Clinical Medicine [17411952200]
  5. Project of Precision Medical Transformation Application of NMMU [2017JZ42]
  6. Top Project of the Military Medical Science and Technology Youth Training Program [17QNP017]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20181411]
  8. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [1U24CA199374-01, R01CA202752-01A1, R01CA208236-01A1, R01 CA216579-01A1, R01 CA220581-01A1, 1U01 CA239055-01]
  9. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [1R43EB028736-01]
  10. National Center for Research Resources [1C06 RR12463-01]
  11. VA Merit Review Award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service [IBX004121A]
  12. DoD Breast Cancer Research Program Breakthrough Level 1 Award [W81XWH-19-1-0668]
  13. DOD Prostate Cancer Idea Development Award [W81XWH-15-1-0558]
  14. DOD Lung Cancer Investigator-Initiated Translational Research Award [W81XWH-18-1-0440]
  15. DOD Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-16-1-0329]
  16. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund
  17. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering
  18. Clinical and Translational Science Award Program (CTSA) at Case Western Reserve University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is associated with the accurate determination of tumor grade. However, because it is an invasive procedure there is a need to explore alternative noninvasive procedures. Purpose To develop and validate a noncontrast radiomics model for the preoperative prediction of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-pNET) grade (G). Study Type Retrospective, single-center study. Subjects Patients with pathologically confirmed PNETs (139) were included. Field Strength/Sequence 3T/breath-hold single-shot fast-spin echo T-2-weighted sequence and unenhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted fat-suppressed sequences. Assessment Tumor features on contrast MR images were evaluated by three board-certified abdominal radiologists. Statistical Tests Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the clinical model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and linear discriminative analysis (LDA) were used to select the features and to construct a radiomics model. The performance of the models was assessed using the training cohort (97 patients) and the validation cohort (42 patients), and decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied for clinical use. Results The clinical model included 14 imaging features, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was 0.769 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.675-0.863) in the training cohort and 0.729 (95% CI, 0.568-0.890) in the validation cohort. The LDA included 14 selected radiomics features that showed good discrimination-in the training cohort (AUC, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.758-0.916) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.518-0.874). In the decision curves, if the threshold probability was 0.17-0.84, using the radiomics score to distinguish NF-pNET G1 and G2/3, offered more benefit than did the use of a treat-all-patients or treat-none scheme. Data Conclusion The developed radiomics model using noncontrast MRI could help differentiate G1 and G2/3 tumors, to make the clinical decision, and screen pNETs grade. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 2

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available