4.2 Article

Habitat suitability of an at-risk, monolectic, ground-nesting bee Hesperapis oraria and its floral host Balduina angustifolia at two spatial scales along the Northern Gulf of Mexico

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 561-573

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-020-00236-0

Keywords

Barrier islands; CART; Classification tree; Coastalplain honeycombhead; Gulf coast solitary bee

Funding

  1. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project [FLA-JAY-005222]
  3. U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service [GUIS-00172]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hesperapis oraria, Snelling and Stage (Hymenoptera: Melittidae) is endemic to northern coastal habitats of the Gulf of Mexico and is a pollen specialist of floral host Balduina angustifolia Pursh. (Asteraceae). Specialization and restricted geographic distribution along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico warrants further investigation into habitat requirements of the bee. This study quantifies the habitat use of H. oraria in association with B. angustifolia distribution at regional and landscape spatial scales using a classification tree species distribution modeling approach. Hesperapis oraria density was lower on barrier island sites compared with coastal mainland sites; no H. oraria were found on non-coastal mainland sites. The regional distribution of H. oraria was driven by the number of B. angustifolia patches, while at the landscape scale H. oraria presence was predicted most strongly by B. angustifolia patch area, plant density, as well as distance from ephemeral wetlands. The regional distribution of B. angustifolia was influenced by the proximity to the bay and within a landscape B. angustifolia distribution was strongly influenced by the stability of the landscape feature in which it was found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available