4.7 Article

Development of reservoir operation functions in SWAT plus for national environmental assessments

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 583, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124556

Keywords

Calibration guidelines; Reservoir module; SWAT; IPEAT; Optimization

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS, USA) Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)-Wildlife and Cropland components [505702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is one of the most extensively used watershed-scale models across the world. In recent years, in order to enhance the potential of SWAT code maintenance and future development, a completely reconstructed version of SWAT, dubbed SWAT+, has been just released. In addition to the new model structure in SWAT+, reservoir operation functions have been added to improve the performance of model simulations. Before conducting watershed-scale model simulations, reservoir functions of SWAT+ were further coupled with the automatic calibration tool, IPEAT, to better consider the interactions among reservoir parameters and the corresponding hydrologic processes. In this study, a total of 123 reservoirs were simulated at daily scale across the contiguous United States (CONUS). A series of reference values of reservoir parameters (total 15) were categorized based on different classifications: (i) reservoir capacity; (ii) reservoir release; (iii) climate conditions; and, (iv) reservoir storage and release. Overall results showed that the performance of reservoir simulations at daily scales is satisfactory by commonly adopted statistical measures. In different scenarios, SfNFD (seasonal flood control drawdown days during non-flood season) (from 5 to 126 days), EfFLD (exclusive flood control drawdown days) (from 0.1 to 2.1 days) and EfFLC (exclusive flood control constant flow) (from 4.8 to 6.5 ha-m) are sensitive parameters and the converged parameter ranges were close to each other but not for other parameters. The recommended parameter ranges may be embedded by varying sources of uncertainty. However, the proposed calibration guidelines provide fast and accessible reference for future SWAT+ studies especially in subjects related to reservoir operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available