4.7 Article

New insight into reactive oxidation species (ROS) for bismuth-based photocatalysis in phenol removal

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 399, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122939

Keywords

Photocatalysis; Bismuth based semiconductors; OH radicals; Holes; Reactive oxidation species

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology (Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China)
  2. Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong province [tsqn201909058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bismuth-based semiconductors (BBS) are a group of promising candidates applied to visible light-induced photocatalysis. With deep positions of valence bands (2.34-4.04 eV), BBS exhibited excellent activity in oxidation processes. Fundamental studies on the reactive oxidation species primarily focused on TiO2 under ultraviolet, and it was recognized that OH radicals were effective reactive oxidative species in photocatalytic oxidation processes. This verdict may not be applicable for all other photocatalytic systems. In this study, the reactive oxidation species for BBS in the photocatalytic decomposition of phenol were explored. BBS were prepared with Hierarchical structures and high crystallinity. It was found that OH radicals and superoxide radicals were negligibly produced in most BBS photocatalytic systems. Instead, separated holes on the valence band may directly react with adsorbed species including organics, and acted as the primary ROS. One of the possible explanations of this phenomenon may be due to the shorter lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers on most BBS (212.3-415.7 ms) compared to that of TiO2 (1193.8 ms). Photocatalytic reaction pathways of degradation of phenol were also different between BBS and TiO2, which were proposed. This work shed light on the significance of addressing and clarifying the reactive oxidation species in BBS photocatalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available